AS GENERAL ELECTION SEASON continues to take shape in Rhode Island, this week finds the candidates from the two major political parties releasing plans for school security, dropping a new round of negative television ads, and dealing with the fallout from - or momentum obtained by - the most recent WPRI/RWU poll (which showed Democratic Governor Gina Raimondo with an expanded lead over opponent, Republican Cranston Mayor Allan Fung).
These pieces, like the yearslong back and forth between the two candidates, who first faced off against each other in the 2014 Rhode Island gubernatorial election, will set much of the background when they square off in the first gubernatorial debate, this Thursday September 27th. The debate is presented by WPRI and will be held at Roger Williams University in Bristol.
Also participating in the debate will be independent gubernatorial candidate Joe Trillo, whose 7% polling numbers and seemingly minimal fundraising were enough to meet WPRI parent company NextStar’s debate participation criteria.
The Bartholomewtown Podcast will be live-tweeting and reporting from the debate this Thursday. Follow me on Twitter for the latest.
Simultaneously, however, independent Dr. Luis-Daniel Munoz and Moderate Bill Gilbert, two of the three gubernatorial candidates to not receive invitations to the debate, have been vocal in their critique of the selection process.
Dr. Munoz released an Op-Ed that claims the debate criteria and process is discriminatory against him and his campaign. Citing the exception WPRI made for Bob Healy in 2014, by allowing a candidate with almost no funding or concrete polling numbers to participate, Dr. Munoz is holding a silent protest at Roger Williams University during the debate and seeking to draw attention to this aspect of the race.
However, when asked whether he believed the WPRI debate was discriminatory in not including Dr. Munoz, Joseph Molina Flynn of The Rhode Island Latino Political Action Committee told me that WPRI “is not being discriminatory in this instance. We understand the Bob Healey exception, however WPRI is now owned by a different parent company, and Dr. Munoz didn’t meet their criteria this go-around.”
I’ve included Dr. Munoz’ Op-Ed at the conclusion of this blog.
Bill Gilbert approached the issue differently, arguing that his resources and ballot placement should allow him a similar exception as the one made to Mr. Healey in 2014. For complete summary of this side of the issue, check out TYLER SALK’S CONVERSATION WITH MR. GILBERT ON 990WBOB.COM
1. THE NATICKS, a wonderful band based in South County, who put on an incredibly fun DIY festival in their backyard this past weekend. The Indian Corner Music Festival had all-the-makings of a community based around live, original music, good food and multi-generational, uncompromised fun. Yours truly was fortunate enough to perform at it with silverteeth.
2. THE 4TH ANNUAL SEPTEMBERFEST is this Saturday September 29th, on Block Island. Curator Dave Flamand has built a magical getaway event, filled with music, art and nature. This year’s lineup is stacked with heaps of the region’s favorite original artists. See ya out there. Follow me on Instagram stories to come along on the excursion this weekend.
DR. LUIS-DANIEL MUNOZ’ OP ED:
Most of the battles we have undertaken for the gain or restoration of civil rights and individual liberties were in opposition to exclusionary policies that were made and intended for the integrity of an exclusive society.
The purpose of this letter is to inform Rhode Islanders of the discriminatory practices inherent in Rhode Island’s political arena and those practices shared by certain political media outlets, which is exemplified by the exclusivity of WPRI’s scheduled televised gubernatorial debate.
WPRI (channel 12) in collaboration with Roger Williams University will be hosting the first televised gubernatorial debate on Thursday, September 27th, which will include only three out of six gubernatorial candidates on the election ballot. I believe that the exclusion criteria created and enforced by WPRI and its parent company is inherently DISCRIMINATORY, and I have written a letter to the FCC, Rhode Island Board of Elections, and WPRI staff to express my concerns. (see below)
Over the past several months, WPRI has provided coverage to two independent candidates, and a moderate party candidate, but chose to deny me that opportunity. The lack of inclusion in the upcoming televised debate only reinforces my earlier concerns regarding potential discrimination. In 2014, WPRI made an exception to their enforcement of the exclusion criteria by including Mr. Robert Healey in the televised gubernatorial debate, while he had not fulfilled a similar criterion (i.e., he had not raised sufficient campaign funds).
Over the past several months, I have reached out to staff members at WPRI in an attempt to access equal time. WPRI is one of three TV and radio stations that did not provide me with an equal opportunity to share my platform, which would help Rhode Island voters understand their choices in November. The additional stations/outlets include, Rhode Island Public Radio (RIPR) and ABC6 news. These organizations have chosen to omit the diversity of thoughts and platforms available to voters on the general election ballot, a decision that will only benefit the incumbent Governor.
The persistent corruption that exist in Rhode Island politics cannot be tackled if those that are given the power to inform continue to withhold information from the public. On the campaign trail, I have been asked to step aside frequently, but these experiences have only strengthened my resolve. On the other hand, I believe that excluding me from a debate is a greater insult to our democratic process because it further empowers those who wish to sustain the same old Rhode Island politics.
My personal journey in rising out of one of Rhode Island’s toughest cities in pursuit of the American dream, and my message of programmatic change that can result in economic opportunity and justice for all people, should not be dismissed or disregarded in this election. It is economic opportunity and economic justice that every Rhode Islander deserves, and this is the basis of why I am running for Governor.
It’s time to rise up, speak up, and to make your voices heard! Share this letter with at least 15 of your friends and family, and tell them that it’s time we stand, walk, and run together. If not us, then who?
www.facebook.com/Rhode2Liberty (Like the page)
http://www.luisdanielmunoz.com (Learn more)
My personal and professional experiences have left me with a deep understanding of the challenges that our communities, schools, health systems, and local economies are facing. I believe that we must reduce the burden of taxation on families, beginning with the removal of RI’s most regressive taxes (e.g., the “car tax” and “tangible property tax” that affect individuals and small businesses, respectively). There is a monopoly on health insurance in Rhode Island that contributes to rising premium rates and rising cost of care, while we must stabilize those premium rates and invest in community health to ensure access to health services at reasonable prices. We must also invest in our youth and in new educational approaches, which will leave students with the fundamental skills needed to access better paying jobs and access to greater opportunities.
My belief is that if we provide families and individuals with the necessary work and life skills, reasonable access to affordable health services, and with the opportunity to become engaged leaders within their community, then we will produce a stronger and healthier workforce that will attract industries, foster safer communities, and strengthen the shared value-system that is representative of our great country.
Letter forwarded to WPRI, FCC, and Board of Elections (see below):
“The purpose of this email is to formally request participation in the upcoming WPRI televised debate. In previous emails to the WPRI team, I have expressed concerns regarding the lack of coverage as compared to the other independent(s) in the race. Following an informative discussion with officials at the FCC, I have come to better understand the various interpretations of the equal time rules as it applies to news interviews.
“Nevertheless, I continue to have concerns regarding the practice of excluding candidates from general election televised debates. The WPRI sponsored poll as a tool used to enforce the WPRI exclusion criteria, along with the monetary/funding requirements section, lead me to believe that the established criteria unfairly discriminates against certain candidates. Additionally, exceptions to the criteria have been made in the past, which I have not been afforded. As an example of exceptions that were previously made, Mr. Robert Healey was given an opportunity to participate in the WPRI televised debate in 2014, and though he may have been able to demonstrate the required poll percentages related to his previous Lt. Governor’s race in 2010, he did not meet the monetary/funding requirements.
“As a ballot-certified candidate who has dedicated over a year to the process of campaigning, canvassing, projecting a thoughtful platform, and making financial, professional and personal sacrifices to provide voters with an option/choice… I am simply asking for the opportunity to present my candidacy. In a time where so many are fighting to preserve the right to speak freely and the necessity to be informed (transparency), I am simply asking for the same opportunity that Mr. Robert Healey was given to educate and inform the public regarding my campaign and the issues at stake in this gubernatorial race.”
GET IN TOUCH
JOIN THE BARTHOLOMEWTOWN FACEBOOK GROUP!
DOES YOUR EVENT, BUSINESS OR ORGANIZATION WANT TO SPONSOR BARTHOLOMEWTOWN?
PODCAST/DIGITAL/PRINT/RADIO OPPORTUNITIES AVAILABLE
REACH ENGAGED RHODE ISLANDERS!
LEARN MORE: BILL@BARTHOLOMEWTOWN.COM
Read More 990WBOB
Unbiased, Unfiltered. WBOB's Original Reads feature our brightest and boldest personalities, offering their two-cents on the goings on of news, sports, politics, entertainment, and business. -- Are our opinions always PC? Nope. Are they always perfect? Nah. But, are they always 100% authentic? Absolutely!